GAO renews critique of FDA medical device system

GAO renews critique of FDA medical device system

April 14th, 2011 // 11:36 am @

Government investigators say the Food and Drug Administration is putting patients at risk by approving sensitive medical devices such as hip joints and heart defibrillators under the same streamlined system intended for power wheelchairs, stitches and catheters.

May 11 Top Selling Webinar – FDA Expectations of Senior Management
Save 50% Now with Offer Code 1012199

The Government Accountability Office will tell Congress Wednesday that the approvals remain a serious issue for the government — more than two years after the watchdog agency first cited the problem to the FDA, according to testimony obtained by The Associated Press.

The GAO previously faulted the FDA in a 2009 for not reclassifying more than 26 types of devices so they receive more stringent reviews. Since then, the agency has cleared 67 individual, high-risk devices through the so-called 510(k) system, which is used to clear the vast majority of devices.

Wednesday’s hearing comes as the FDA faces complaints from medical device manufacturers that the speed of U.S. device reviews lag behind other countries. At the same time, public safety advocates point to reports by GAO and others that suggest the agency is being too lenient in clearing critical devices that keep patients alive.

The Senate committee will hear testimony from representatives of both groups.

For its part, the FDA’s Dr. William Maisel is expected to tell lawmakers that the FDA will reclassify the 26 types of high-risk devices cited by GAO before the end of 2012.

“FDA evaluates thousands of medical devices annually and the vast majority of these devices perform well and improve patient health,” states Maisel’s prepared testimony. He is deputy director for science in FDA’s device center.

Medical devices include everything from tongue depressors to silicone breast implants and pacemakers. In 1976, Congress set up a three-tiered classification system for the devices.

Low-risk devices like crutches and hospital beds do not require FDA review. Moderate-risk devices such as mercury thermometers and power wheel chairs could be cleared by the speedy 510(k) method. If the FDA doesn’t object to a manufacturer’s 510(k) application within 90 days, the device is automatically approved for marketing.

High-risk devices such as pacemakers and heart valves have to go through tighter scrutiny, and their manufacturers are required to provide studies demonstrating their safety and effectiveness. Devices classified as high-risk tended to be ones that are implanted in the body or could spell the difference between life and death.

An exception was carved out for new versions of high-risk devices that were already on the market in 1976, such as certain types of defibrillators and orthopedic implants.

These devices could go through the faster 510(k) system if manufacturers could show they were “substantially equivalent” to their precursors. In 1990, Congress ordered the FDA to end the practice, but it has continued even as generations of technology have come and gone.

The report urged the FDA to promptly resolve the problem, either by carrying out full reviews or reclassifying the devices as lower risk, if appropriate.

According to GAO, the FDA has reclassified only one group of devices since 2009, leaving 26 remaining.

Subscribe Now

Featured Partner